JackGreenEarth

1. Can I see some evidence for that, please? Like, a peer reviewed study?

2. Who was the sample of ‘people’?

3. What is the distinction between different plants? Like, just kitchen fruits and vegetables I’d expect to be much more than 10, unless you group them all in ‘drupes’, ‘fruits’, etc

4. Even if a random distributed sample of modern English speaking people do recognise more logos than plants, that’s likely because there’s a large advertising industry trying to make it so, whereas plant recognition is learnt in school or home.

That may be true. But that’s also just an appeal to authority. What’s more relevant is that they’re unethical. What if international law said they were ok, would you also think they’re ok?

They’re making it legal. But law != morality.

I believe in free speech, I don’t think anyone should be banned or censored for saying their honest opinion, as that doesn’t convince them of your point of view, might push them further into the view they have, and creates an echo chambers where challenging opinions aren’t present - both through actual censorship and self censorship out of fear of being banned for talking against the groupthink.