

Yeah, the one where your forced to move to Russia because you don’t have the capital be be an individualist where you spawned
No one of consequence.


Yeah, the one where your forced to move to Russia because you don’t have the capital be be an individualist where you spawned


Do you think people are protesting…but not voting?
Its a sentiment echoed by tankies on Lemmy, if they even protest.
Still I do know a few people that won’t vote, but do show up to protests.
I have undying love for Leto II.


You know what… I don’t see why not. Can we get the God Emperor a front row seat too?
The first paragraph is also consistent with “why capitalism works” in case you need a reply because you’re being called out


Sounds like they need another $20 Billion


Kinda wish I had a trolling reddit account to post on the libertarian subs


THO is pretty awesome


For sure, and given that it is a politics com and not just a news I think such a post does belong there and clearly the members agree. Im going to lean on power trip.


I thought news was supposed to be objective?
Really no news is ever objective. From your own posts about section certainly isn’t here to be objective. To be clear it is a bias I agree with.
Our Mission
Free Speech For People works to renew our democracy and our United States Constitution for we the people. Founded on the day of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling, Free Speech For People envisions a democratic process in which all people have an equal voice and an equal vote. We advance this mission with the following innovative, effective, and complementary strategies:
- We fight for the right to vote; for free and fair elections, for reliable and secure voting systems, and for the bedrock promise of political equality for all;
- We draft and promote key constitutional amendments to restore our democracy by establishing a constitutional right to vote, majority rule (one person-one vote) in the election of the president and vice president, and a constitutionally-mandated public campaign finance system and strict limits on private political contributions and spending; eliminating the judicially fabricated doctrine of corporate constitutional rights; and implementing the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment; -We engage in legal advocacy in the courts to advance a new jurisprudence on money in politics and to confront the misuse of the U.S. Constitution to claim corporate exemptions from our laws;
- We develop and advocate for model laws and other tools to challenge big money in politics and to make corporations responsible to the public; and We challenge corruption at the highest levels of our government and lead bold campaigns for accountability under the law.


Perhaps we need a tag for think tanks or opinion column articles? I can see why people think they are valuable to discourse tho i I personally don’t like them (particularly when they pretend to be news or research). Maybe a separate comm?


So to me it looks like the content is on topic, but it’s a case of quality control
The video is pretty good (the whole channel is something I think the com would like). Still do you feel it would be better for me to change the title to one that is descriptive or keep the title as OP made (likely trying to game the algo)


Except there is no twitter link and the text field also has a description.

I am linking a video from what is a pretty decent privacy channel, so it is on topic. I am not being rude, pushing a shitcoin or ad for big tech, nor is it a repost. I did PM the mod saying:
I’m not sure why my post is removed. Its relevant to privacy as that’s the theme for that channel. Its not an x link and I included the description of the video in the text field.
I would at least like a reply back as to why its removed so that I can keep that in mind next time I want to share something that may be relevant.


The Ted Cruz entry isn’t very flattering.


Newsmax reservists? Draft from OAN?


To be a fly on the wall… Or journalist with signal 😩


No, but more importantly not every election is going to have a progressive on the ballot. Voting for a progressive is what we should do. Voting blue is only when progressive isn’t an option and we need to minimize harm.


Dems are letting us down in many ways, but we leftists also refuse to engage in electoral politics, so we shouldn’t be surprised.


Devilish that capitalism has made profitability synonymous with efficiency
That meme also applies to tankies that discourage voting and forming a third party.