• T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                15
                ·
                4 months ago

                Other countries are trading with israel too, russia, China and many more, they are all complicit in aiding the israel war machine, so is it still “nato”?

                • thanks AV@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  17
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  Whatabout russia and china is monumental cope

                  Why cant you admit that nato is responsible and should be held responsible the same way as any other entity that did not discontinue weapons transfers to israel after the siege began?

                  Oh its american mic weapons? Okay, nato is an american defense pact.

                  Why are you trying to dismiss culpability as if European nations dont actively support and enable the genocide in the exact same material capacity as america? Take your lumps.

                  • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    13
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    It literally isn’t “monumental cope” Israel imports more from China than any other country, helping to fund what they do.

                    I can’t admit nato is responsible because it’s not, nato is a defensive pact, the countries that are part of nato are the problem, not the organization, it is also not “an American defense pact”, there are many countries involved.

                    I literally said some European countries are responsible? But if you want to go to “NATO” being responsible it’s clearly china’s fault, because they allow the Israeli capitalism to flourish, allowing Aipac to bribe the Americans (see how fucking stupid that sounds?)

                • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  In the Gaza genocide no. In the West Bank yes.

                  You seem to avoid the point that these vehicle suicide bombs are 100% NATO funded and supplied.

                  • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    9
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    In both, the Gaza genocide and in the West Bank. These suice bombs aren’t nato funded, just because the countries they originate from are some of natos members doesn’t mean it’s nato. Yes, the US Canada, England are funding the genocide, and providing equipment sure, but it’s not NATO, Israel get funds it army through trade with hundreds of nations.

              • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                15
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                You buy a gun from a store and ammo and then you kill someone, the arms company is responsable for your actions?

                Also dont mix up Amerikas actions with all of NATO

                • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Yes the arms company is responsible for selling you a gun when you are literally Adolf Hitler in the middle of the Holocaust.

                  Also America and Europe are paying for the weapons.