When having to admit their fault the moderator started looking for arbitrary reasons to ban me. Such as not using the exact terminology of the Amnesty report. Which does not call it genocide.
The moderator is also watching user votes, and calling out people not voting with him.
How about this lmao
If they’re the same exact rule being applied fairly in both instances, then it would be hypocrisy to criticize something that happens in one community which is routine in the community criticizing. Is this fair?
I’m not saying that is true of this situation. I am saying that is the argument being made that you aren’t refuting very effectively from my perspective. Lmao.
If the rule was the same, and the bans goat was criticised were due to an identical disengage rule application as we have here, then it would not be hypocritical to open a thread in YPTB, but it would be hypocritical for people who uphold the disengage rule here to criticise goat for using it. But nobody did that.
This is just a discussion without a purpose. You don’t even know if it’s the same rule, you’re just making hypotheticals and it’s honestly a waste of both our times.
But aren’t we having fun? :3c