When having to admit their fault the moderator started looking for arbitrary reasons to ban me. Such as not using the exact terminology of the Amnesty report. Which does not call it genocide.


The moderator is also watching user votes, and calling out people not voting with him.

  • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    I am not sure if this is the place to continue the discussion, but you are free to step up for the admin and find another respected human rights organisation which calls it a genocide. The admin had to concede because he could not.

    While the definition of genocide is so wide that it encompasses basically any mass killing, it actually means trying to exterminate a ppoulation. Ukraine has also not started a genocide case against Russia at the ICJ for obvious reasons. Russia has an ICJ genocide case against Ukraine which it will probably lose.

    • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      I am pointing out that there are limitations to Amnesty’s approach. Not debate club stuff, but real issues.

      You wouldn’t be this cavalier if you got to sent to a camp for going to a mosque in Xinjiang or if your wife or daughter got forcibly sterilized.

      I can guarantee you that!

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        10 days ago

        I would also not enjoy going waterboarding in Guantanamo bay.

        If you have a link to any respected human rights organisation claim of genocide I am all ears. If not you should try to convince them, not me.