Sarcasm and irony can both be expressed through text, and neither require projection or assumption (beyond that required to establish basic context (like language)) when written or when expressed verbally. Why are you trying to pretend that’s not the case, when the whole of the written canon is full of thousands of years of ample examples to the contrary?
But I wasn’t being sarcastic, so your detector is clearly faulty? I’m not sure what to tell you except that you made false assumptions. You can either accept that or you can believe you are all knowing, lol
Sure and if you claimed anything different, you’d risk being banned. I get it. It’s transparent, but I get it. Keep on dodging if you like, I’m certainly not trying to wring a confession out of you, just point out that the removal was justified and that you’re going to have to try harder if you want to actually convince anyone.
Did the author die, or was it murder?Sarcasm and irony can both be expressed through text, and neither require projection or assumption (beyond that required to establish basic context (like language)) when written or when expressed verbally. Why are you trying to pretend that’s not the case, when the whole of the written canon is full of thousands of years of ample examples to the contrary?
But I wasn’t being sarcastic, so your detector is clearly faulty? I’m not sure what to tell you except that you made false assumptions. You can either accept that or you can believe you are all knowing, lol
Sure and if you claimed anything different, you’d risk being banned. I get it. It’s transparent, but I get it. Keep on dodging if you like, I’m certainly not trying to wring a confession out of you, just point out that the removal was justified and that you’re going to have to try harder if you want to actually convince anyone.
So you’re the thought police, or at least approve of such methods. Love it.