A few times I’ve come upon the power of a common language in the last few days.

I’ve seen a video about a meeting of Amazonian pajés (shamans) and herbalists sharing and maintaining traditional plant use, facilitated through the common language Portuguese, I’ve read about the success of the Zapatistas where native people are helped in their efforts by the common language Spanish. And just now a post in Anarchism & Social Ecology mixing Spanish and English just as comfortably as my family juggles three languages at home.

Do you know of other examples?

I thought one of the non-evil possible uses of a LLM could be to create a new language like Esperanto, and ideally it would simply be a mix of English and Spanish, to connect a maximum number of people? Or are artificial languages always doomed to fail?

Edit: title, because there is not one language of solarpunk

    • schmorp@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I really felt like that at first, but also I think that using the language of the oppressor to join native forces and maintain and spread traditional knowledge is pretty cool. There is something positive growing out of the horrors of the past, I hope, some new understanding.

      • cerement@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        that’s one area you have to be VERY careful with – co-opting the language of the oppressor is one thing, but in most cases, the oppressor’s language was the one used to erase indigenous languages (cultural genocide) – this was so prevalent across the US and Canada, that many indigenous American societies have to turn to ethnographic records compiled by those same colonizers in an effort to rebuild or recreate their native languages

  • CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Instead of fighting to invent new languages we should fight to preserve indigenous languages.

    When an indigenous language disappears so does often the knowledge that it was used to describe:

    Medicinal knowledge vanishes as Indigenous languages die - Science.org

    With over 40 languages disappearing every day, learning local dialects can help create loan words that broadens our understanding of the world.

    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jan/16/linguists-language-culture-loss-end-of-century-sea-levels-rise

  • Ben Matthews@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    There are still enthusiasts of alt/inter-langs, more modern than Esperanto, which only has european roots - I prefer those that also blend in words from Chinese, Hindi, Arabic etc.

    See also this community .

    However modern technology - such as instant translation built into phones (very useful for Ukrainian-French here last year) - changes the situation, maybe diminishes the motivation to learn such languages, although potentially facilitating their use.

    • senloke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      which only has european roots

      Oh I love it how people shit on Esperanto for it’s euroncentrism. Argumentation by perfectionism, that’s this. No one says that Esperanto could not evolve into a more egalitarian language, but feeling morally superior because its inventor chose to take from one cohesive language family (latin, romance languages) because the roman empire conquered the world a long time ago … is silly and wrong.

  • max@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    this is just my 2 cents as a silly cat on the interwebs:

    artificial languages designed to be international ones always feel a little authoritarian to me, as people usually arent going to want to learn something that isnt useful or fun to them, so youre at a disadvantage going that route, as you fail to pick up the population required for a common language. to make if work, you need to lower barriers to learning languages, while also providing a motivation to learn it, and for a new conlang, that initial growth is the hardest part, from what ive seen.

    as for using an LLM to create a mix of eng+esp, that really doesnt scale much past the americas imo in terms of speaking population, what about Hindi or Mandarin as an example? not to mention the issues with LLMs in general on the environment. as far as i know there really isnt a way to make a conlang that fits in all compatible aspects for all the world’s languages, and honestly, i dont think that’s a bad thing. languages are fun and beautiful when they are unique, though it does stifle communication between people.

    i think youre headed down the wrong path here, there is no (single) language of solarpunk, and i think there shouldn’t be. to me, solarpunk has always been about the people, and people speak different languages, have different dialects or accents, or maybe cant speak at all. to me, what you described was the language of solarpunk, overcoming challenges in communication for the benefit of all. in my solarpunk vision, there are many languages in a community, and most people can speak a few, and sign at least partially if they can,while translators and language education is publicly funded (whether though coops or a government). solarpunk needs translators, not dictators telling them how to speak (side eyeing the french govt here). imho international languages font work within the moral framework of solarpunk, you need either colonialism or globalism to spread a language far enough to become a common language, im not sure how youd acheive it otherwise.

    anywho, i only dabble in a little bit of conlangs myself, so i may have missed something xx meow

    • schmorp@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      many languages in a community, and most people can speak a few

      I guess that’s the world we are approaching already.

      artificial languages designed to be international ones always feel a little authoritarian to me

      Not sure, the efforts to create international languages never seemed to come from the authoriarian corner historically, or do they?