Based on the modlog, I’m going to take an guess and say that the person in question posted an AI-generated image representing a fictitious but realistic child doing something sexual with an adult, and the removal entry doesn’t show in the modlog because it was purged.
“Technically” this is not CSAM, but the difference does not matter here. No sane instance allows images depicting sex with children; doubly so if it can be reasonably confused with CSAM, like AI generated images can. So, if my guess is correct, the user deserved it.
And, if my guess is wrong (it could be - I don’t know), the user still deserves a permaban, but under another reason: just look at the modlog. It boils down to the user assuming (i.e. making shit up, lying to know what they don’t) things about other users, so they can screech at them. Being an assumer on its own is already bad, but a combative assumer is even worse.
They (you?; IDK/DC) don’t know it. They’re assuming all this shite.
And something needs to be said about their (your?) attitude towards people based on instance: it’s both factually incorrect and morally disgusting. What they’re (you’re?) doing there is acting based on a stereotype.
Based on the modlog, I’m going to take an guess and say that the person in question posted an AI-generated image representing a fictitious but realistic child doing something sexual with an adult, and the removal entry doesn’t show in the modlog because it was purged.
“Technically” this is not CSAM, but the difference does not matter here. No sane instance allows images depicting sex with children; doubly so if it can be reasonably confused with CSAM, like AI generated images can. So, if my guess is correct, the user deserved it.
And, if my guess is wrong (it could be - I don’t know), the user still deserves a permaban, but under another reason: just look at the modlog. It boils down to the user assuming (i.e. making shit up, lying to know what they don’t) things about other users, so they can screech at them. Being an assumer on its own is already bad, but a combative assumer is even worse.
Assuming things about other users?
Assuming some lemmy.world user is from lemmy.ml.
Assuming OsrsNeedsF2P is not in Korea, even after being shown clear evidence they are.
Assuming the user above is a “shill for fascists”, based on them saying North Korea doesn’t want to use nukes.
They (you?; IDK/DC) don’t know it. They’re assuming all this shite.
And something needs to be said about their (your?) attitude towards people based on instance: it’s both factually incorrect and morally disgusting. What they’re (you’re?) doing there is acting based on a stereotype.