Russian warship, go fuck yourself
The attack, thought to be the first time Ukrainian drones have attacked a Russian ship in an area of the Baltic Sea open to civilian maritime traffic, has raised questions about whether Ukraine could expand its strikes.
Why do journalists write like this? Ukraine struck somewhere they never struck before, and it raises questions about whether they might do exactly what they just did?
Gotta hit that length quota. But you gotta stay at a roughly 5th grade reading level for the widest reach, so you can’t just thesaurus your way out with bigger words.
I think more specifically it’s trying to imply it’s “more” serious bc now it’s in the lawn of other countries/in civilian marine traffic. It can also further imply if Estonia is permissive/supporting Ukraine using its airspace, it “gives permission” for Russia to bomb Estonia/provoke nato.
I’m assuming this was an airborne drone, it would be quite a feat getting a sea drone there.
Not really… ship the drone in a container, put it on a ship, drop it into internal water.
Or… just use said ship to bring the drones there.
Pretty easily done.
Plus, I doubt a drone would be allowed to fly through NATO territory to strike a Russian target.
A rare underground burrowing drone, striking from where they least expect it: the sea floor.
You joke but there probably is some borrow drone device the public doesn’t know about yet
Ukraine did say they have specialized drones to hunt Russians in underground pipes.
Russian warship undergoes submarine therapy successfully.
Oh no. How terrible. Anyway, what’s everyone having for dinner?
