This is weirdly phrased since I haven’t spoken about this before, but no I’m not trying to misrepresent anything.
You and OP are normalizing these sort of operations by saying it’s ok because the previous presidents had done it in the past. Your stand on this topic is vague. It seems like you don’t think these war inciting actions are morally right, but you also don’t think it’s an offense justifiable for impeachment.
You really need to work on your reading comprehension.
Acknowledging that something isn’t illegal/impeachable is completely different from normalizing.
Reality is what it is, whether we agree with it or not. Should it be different? For sure. Is it different? No, and acknowledging that is NOT normalizing it, it’s just saying that the truth is the truth. What is wrong with that?
This is weirdly phrased since I haven’t spoken about this before, but no I’m not trying to misrepresent anything.
You and OP are normalizing these sort of operations by saying it’s ok because the previous presidents had done it in the past. Your stand on this topic is vague. It seems like you don’t think these war inciting actions are morally right, but you also don’t think it’s an offense justifiable for impeachment.
You really need to work on your reading comprehension.
Acknowledging that something isn’t illegal/impeachable is completely different from normalizing.
Reality is what it is, whether we agree with it or not. Should it be different? For sure. Is it different? No, and acknowledging that is NOT normalizing it, it’s just saying that the truth is the truth. What is wrong with that?