The power trip / ban doesn’t bother me, but the misinformation does. They present as leftist, but flare up around US elections discouraging voter turnout via ‘bOtH siDeS’ garbage. that only ever elevates shit like MAGA.

In the linked thread, OP promotes rioting while discouraging voter turnout. My comments agreed with activism like riots, but pointed out that it’s not an either-or thing. You can riot -and- vote; and even if you don’t have it in you to riot, still do vote.

Banned.

You can see my removed comment quoted in the post after mine.

This ‘blue MAGA’ tankie shit is somehow worse than the loud-and-clear MAGA shit over on Reddit - at least those neonazis were honest about who they were.

Anywho, YSK. Spaces like r/conservative were clearly labeled and easy to avoid; LateStageCapitalism@lemmy.world presents as a cause worth rallying around, but only until you peel up the veneer and see that they’re the same fucking thing.

Also please vote. In addition to whatever flavor of activism tickles your fancy.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Note to all: This is not the place to get on your “VOTE” soapboaxes. Stick to judging the moderation action.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    I think I will opt for civility and choose to endorse free speech, whether in an echo-chamber or not.

  • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    They present as leftist, but flare up around US elections discouraging voter turnout via ‘bOtH siDeS’ garbage. that only ever elevates shit like MAGA.

    Trying to hijack a community like latestagecapitalism to tell people to vote for more latestagecapitalism is peak. Writing off everything to the left of you conservative tells me the mods were absolutely right in banning you.

  • NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    This ‘blue MAGA’ tankie shit is somehow worse than the loud-and-clear MAGA shit over on Reddit - at least those neonazis were honest about who they were.

    Okay, so we should say our goodbyes then?

  • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    I judge the moderation action as Lemmy typical shillness. Incidentally, remember, propaganda usually tries to play both sides, promoting disengagement and engagement where it suits them.

  • chloroken@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    7 days ago

    Hilarious how folks can actually believe that socialists are the blue MAGA as opposed to the genocidal democrats and DSA. It is so feeble and tired.

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    PTB. Everyone should be voting in this election. People like that boil all nuance down to two black and white naive takes:

    • That you are either a voter OR you go out and protest. In reality there is nothing stopping you from doing both.
    • That you should not vote because there is no unicorn candidate. In reality there will never be a perfect candidate.

    I have voted in every election in the last 20 years, local, state, federal - and I have yet to see a candidate that I agree with completely. It will never happen. Expecting change tomorrow is a naive take. Slow incremental change is the only change I’ve seen on this planet. You are going to need to compromise on candidates, because it’s always a bad and a worse candidate, and not voting means you are okay with the worse candidate. It’s happening right now, and people are shocked pikachu of what happened in the last election. The reason is simple, people didn’t vote.

    Conservatives desperately want us to not go and vote. That should really tell you everything. Does it mean you have to agree with the candidate on everything? Absolutely not. Does it mean that your morals are the same as the person you voted for? Also absolutely not. Politics is usually voting against things you don’t want than voting for things you do. People are strange complex creatures, and you’ll never find a candidate who agrees with you. (Yes, even in multiple party scenarios).

    If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice

    • Awooooooga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Imagine handing your country to fascists because you’re too much of a little bitch to engage in your own democracy. I feel so lucky to be able to vote in my country. It’s my responsibility and I am privileged to have it. It was earned by the blood of MILLIONS.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Big two I fought for were for gay marriage and health care. Gay marriage was not legal when I was growing up and we had no state sponsored healthcare. Right now we have both of those thanks to people getting out and making their voices heard. Everyone rallied behind those two things and they happened.

        Now they are at risk because people have become complacent. Sinicism and complacency go hand in hand. You do that and things like Roe get repealed, and now I’m worried we’ll backslide on these issues because people don’t care anymore.

        • NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          And yet the death and destruction done by your country continues to increase. Fossil fuel production continues to increase.

          • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Okay “Nonconfrontational” you’re obviously just wanting to stir something up, and I’m not going to give you what you want. Go find someone else.

            • NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              6 days ago

              Listen I’m glad you got your human rights recognized but do you not think the lives of tens of thousands of brown children are worth rioting in the streets until change is made? Or is it only now that colonialism abroad has become fascism at home that you give a fuck?

    • [deleted]@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Slow incremental change is the only change I’ve seen on this planet.

      Only positive progressive change is slow and incremental. Regressives and authoritarians are able to pull off change pretty fast when they realize the system is too slow to stop them and won’t punish them for wrecking everything.

      That is why it is important to vote in every election to mitigate the damage they want to do.

    • Artisian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      (Relatedly; we’re voting for the lesser of evils mostly because of the voting system we’re using. RTV improves on this substantially, is used in several federal elections across the country, and has reasonable appeal in many places.)

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    Wow. Your post is so reasonable, strongly in favour of rioting, correctly identifying it as better than voting, just allowing for voting. And still banned.

    I’ve blocked a lot of PTB comms because of all the trolly libs calling anyone left of Schumer a tankie then whining about being banned from leftist spaces, but this is a bonkers ban. And from .world as well, not even a leftist instance. 🤷

    To save folks a click:

    Brace yourself for an apparently super edgy hot take:

    Rioting > voting

    rioting & voting > just rioting

    just voting > nothing at all

    Discouraging voting or rioting = supporting the status quo.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Discouraging voting or rioting = supporting the status quo.

      To be silent in the face of oppression is to stand with the oppressor.

    • 0ops@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      That’s… that’s it? What’s ban worthy about that?

    • bedwyr@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I can’t disagree with that at all. I don’t think any reasonable person could.

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Yeah that’s not a serious community. Like I can understand why an anarchist would be vehemently opposed to voting, but a socialist? No. PTB.

    Edit: and furthermore, if they’re so against voting, why haven’t they disabled both downvotes AND upvotes, and only use just the other sort algorithms?

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Anarchist here: voting might be the least important, least effective action you take … but as long as the state still holds power, you should still do it.

    • CubitOom@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Most anarchist are quite supportive of voting, they would just rather have a direct democracy. The real issue for most is hierarchy. Ofcourse, that’s not true for all anarchists.

    • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Edit: and furthermore, if they’re so against voting, why haven’t they disabled both downvotes AND upvotes, and only use just the other sort algorithms?

      Anti-electoralists are not necessarily against voting in literally all circumstances. We’re against voting for candidates for political office.

        • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Exactly. Left-anarchist myself, and the only way is, surprise, voting. Voting and debating. Democracy, for god’s sake. A leader doesn’t necessarily means higher hierarchy; what it really means (or should mean) is just higher responsability with the capacity of fulfilling it.

        • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          You’re never going to get a reasonable answer from them if you get any answer at all. Anarchism only works until the difficult questions start getting asked. This is why there is no anarchist society on the planet other than some extremely small communities that would more reasonably be considered communes.

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          7 days ago

          I’m talking about electoralist voting, not voting in general. Check out our instance governance rules

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    I don’t see any rule you broke so this is a pretty open and shut PTB for me.

    That said, no great loss since these LSC communities are all millenarian fantasy dumpster fires. Capitalism ain’t goin nowhere on its own.

    • anewfox@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      the only leftists i’ve ever met that were serious people were the ones i’ve met in person. terminally online leftists just post through it and have nothing else. they post big endgame-level ideas, but if you ask them how they plan to get there, you get dogpiled and called a nazi. it’s roleplaying for attention on social media.

      • Godric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        I do notice every communist over the age of 20 I meet IRL is an fascinating conversationalist, while the terminally online lemmy.mls have been almost universally insufferable.

        • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Luckily you disproved the point by bringing a plan with you, instead of commenting a zillion times just whining about how nobody is serious and nothing ever changes.

          A total fucking anchor TBF, exactly described by the guy you replied to.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      Capitalism ain’t goin nowhere on its own.

      Well, sure it is. It’s going to fascism on its own.

      (And I’d say, once you get into the full fascist stage, it’s no longer strictly speaking ‘capitalist’ anymore. I’d define capitalism as ‘rule by capital’, but once fascism gets sufficiently entrenched, that’s no longer really the case. At that point, power is no longer determined mainly by how much money you have, it becomes determined by your closeness and standing with the regime’s leaders. Having lots of money often facilitates that, but it’s no longer the primary driving factor – the primary driving factor becomes ideological purity/loyalty and political pandering to the regime. And even those with lots of money can still easily fall out of favor with the regime for any ideological misstep, any perceived threat to or disagreement with the leader, and even those with large amounts of money can still be purged from the regime at a moment’s notice. If it’s possible for the regime’s leader to suddenly decide he doesn’t like you, so then the regime takes your capital away and gives it to someone more regime-friendly, that’s not capitalism anymore.)

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I personally doubt it will be replaced by fascism globally as it’s simply too unstable an ideology, despite some current trends in that direction.

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Well, no – it will never be globally all at once, at least not in the current geopolitical landscape. It will happen to one country at a time. And then when that fascist country inevitably attacks its neighbors, fascism tries to spread that way.

          Though I do wonder if, with the rise of globalism and powerful international corporations headed by fascist pricks, it might eventually end up being a more or less global phenomenon.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    Being banned from latestagecapitalism is an honor. They have conservative mods. You can be banned there for criticizing conservatism or saying things that are too far from Fox News talking points.

    Not really sure how or why we end up with conservative mods in these communities, but it really ruins them.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      LateStageCapitalism is run by a sole moderator who is either a foreign shill or so stupid that they’re doing their work for them for free.

      He bans anyone that goes against his narrative. I am by no means the only person that has spoken out against that sub and its mod. It’s becoming public knowledge at this point that the sub is compromised.

    • psycholocomotor_no2@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      They have communist mods, I think they’re Marxists. I’d respect you more if you at least said you’re against the “extreme left” or something like that instead of pretending that everyone who isn’t liberal is conservative or secretly conservative.