Gets called by demeanitive and vulgar slur once by a insolvent gaslighting middle east bombing pedophile rapist pariah co-conspirator.
Instantly takes the blame on a harmless and substantial group of people with their own selective mutism and freedom of speech.


For a state with Republicans running the state house and senate and has two republicans US senators and six of the seven house delegates are republicans this may be a stance you need to take to have a chance in this state.
I think this is a fallacy: as emphatically as state voters may support anti-trans messaging on a symbolic/narrative level, that doesn’t necessarily translate to support for specific policies. What they care about more than policy is a narrative of strength, and Andrews’ mealy-mouthed denials convey weakness instead.
I think trans people would be a hundred percent better off with Andrews as a senator over any republican.