Keir Starmer has suggested the US is trying to interfere in British democracy after JD Vance, the US vice-president, blamed the murder of the British teenager Henry Nowak on mass migration.
The prime minister’s office responded after the senior Republican politician claimed in a post on X that Nowak would be alive “if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it”.
Downing Street did not name Vance directly but said its response to his comments was that “in recent days we have seen people trying to interfere in our democracy and seeking to stir up division on our streets”.
What has Prince Andrew to do with mass immigration? Never read such nonsense, but what else can I expect from leftist 🤷♂️AFAIK they never work, always the others have to pay, never take responsibility for their actions, it is always the others’ fault … they are lost cases.
Now you can downvote me into oblivion, because this is the only thing you can do 😂😂😂
What has immigration to do with one British person stabbing another. Seems even your complaining about non-sequitors is biased. What else can we expect from the right wing except selective outrage.
As you’re engaging in bad faith allow me to: what we should really be worried about is white on white violence. Knife crime in the UK isn’t all that bad, when you remove white gang activity, even more so when you remove men-on-men violence.
All of which to highlight, your position isn’t a serious one genuinely held. You don’t dislike non-sequitors, you engage in them. You disliked their argument, and it is convenient for you to say you don’t like non-sequitors in this moment. You aren’t serious. This culture war nonsense, the British right loves so much, is merely a distraction from the Epstein class robbing us blind.
What fantasy world you livin’ in? You’re talkin’ like you’ve never heard of chings, opps, or where them man come from.
I’m just making fun of the frequent cases of thought terminating double think among the British/global right.
I thought that was obvious, I highlighted the double think in this very thread, then went on to list a bunch more…
It’s a distraction from the Epstein class robbing us blind. We can tell because of the Panama papers, listen to Murdoch/Epstein in the titular files, they’ll tell you themselves. The British right aren’t serious people with a serious point to make, they’ll say what ever, when ever to justify their presupposed position, source: you.
You’re movin’ like you don’t know the roads at all. Bare white boys get used as fodder. Black gangs are the ones patternin’ the ends.
I’m sure you believe that. Anyway here’s the data: [https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/bulletins/crimeinenglandandwales/yearendingseptember2025#offences-involving-firearms].
Anyway, the most violent demographic in this country is men, men killing men all over the land. Regardless of colour or belief or wealth, it’s all men.
What do you want to do to men because they’re so violent. I’ve heard rumblings of deportation, do you want to deport all men, or is deportation not an effective measure for violence?
Or would you like to drop the nonsense and talk about how you’re being robbed blind by the wealthy elite funding your media.
Removed by mod
… and suddenly they don’t want to talk about violent demographics anymore, thanks for demonstrating my point. It’s thought terminating double think all the way down.
If I can puppet you so easily, just think what billionaires can do to you. I swear I was elbow deep at one point, if you find my watch may I have it back? What would you do if was caught lacking Kermit? Prove my point a third time?
You trippin, bro.
It was a suggestion that ethnic English people, even in the highest reaches of the establishment, are also capable of the most degraded forms of criminality. So why the focus on immigrants?
Do try to keep up.
You should probably sue your mother for poor quality workmanship when producing you, because I can’t imagine being so dull witted that you were unable to work that one out.
Given the fact that Andrew is demonstrably British, I would suggest that the nationality of someone doesn’t have much to do with their ability to be a criminal.
Also unless you are proposing to present us with a minority report style prediction system, I’m not exactly sure how anyone would have known that this particular individual was necessarily more a threat, than any other person from that nationality.
This is how your comment is read: Bla bla bla. My point on my previous comment? Never touched. I guess you did not pass school, which would not surprise me.