• Mactan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    freuds all bullshit in the first place isn’t it? if I remember right that all the dianetics psychoanalytics stuff?

    • DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 months ago

      Controversial, but freud is more outdated than bullshit. And that’s true of a lot of science from the 19th-20th century. His methods and conclusions don’t hold up to modern standards, but he wasn’t just making shit up whole-cloth, he was trying to make sense of his thousands of hours of experience working with people. The field of psychoanalysis evolved substantially during his career and even more in the century after.

      And while a lot of the reaction against 20th century psychoanalysis/psychology is justified, a good portion of it is also driven by health insurance profit seeking that wants to see the mind as a simple mechanism with curable pathologies. “You exhibit symptom x, which means you have illness y, which means we’ll pay for treatment z.”

      Whereas in reality most mental/emotional experiences are multifaceted and layered. The former works fine for a broken bone or a viral infection, but not so well for CPTSD or personality disorders. I think psychoanalysis can be useful as a modality that exists alongside other modalities like CBT.

      • limer@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        A major issue I have with Freud , is that he used his gifts and talents to help cover up and deny childhood sexual abuse he discovered in many of his patients. At first he supported their assertions. Then spent the rest of his life making a theoretical framework that denied rape was common.

        Some people have speculated this turn of events happened after he started to sexually assault his young son.