• ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      National parks and protected lands exist too. Conservation is a vital tree-reliant field.

      • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        You say that like national parks and protected lands aren’t strictly anti-capitalist concepts. Ones that capitalists aren’t trying to destroy constantly and currently.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Or saps, rubber trees and maple trees

      Or useful barks. White birch, cinnamon.

      • higgsboson@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Or just offers shade, or looks nice.

        Those less tangible things also have value both under law and under capitalism. OP has a 4th grade understanding of economics.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Those are things of value but not commodities and are outside what I was using for examples of capitalism. Though fuckers would absolutely charge you to enjoy those things if they can figure out how to make us ;(