Police in London are investigating a suspected antisemitic hate crime attack after four vehicles belonging to a Jewish ambulance service were set on fire.
I dont think we disagree on the general direction of what justice would be. Im pessimistic it can happen there.
Im really fucking sick of clarifying this. I know the full responsibility of my frustration does not fall on you and it may not be fair to demand an answer to the following question but i do hope i can still ask without offending:
Why the fuck is the default assumption that my expectations and hopes are the same, with no gulf between them? What the actual fuck is fucking wrong with so fucking many people, including yourself?
Are you all children? Do you assume im a child? If you assume im a child, is this some sort of default or do i raise some sort of flag?
If you are not a child or assuming im a child then how on earth do you expect depth or nuance when every statement must conform to your immediate visceral emotional response and assume is=aught?
You asked “Must they” as if there was a situation whete they shouldn’t be punished to the full extent of the law (at the very least that’s my interpretation of your question) and then called the uk a terf country that doesn’t have any laws.
I dont think we disagree on the general direction of what justice would be. Im pessimistic it can happen there.
Im really fucking sick of clarifying this. I know the full responsibility of my frustration does not fall on you and it may not be fair to demand an answer to the following question but i do hope i can still ask without offending:
Why the fuck is the default assumption that my expectations and hopes are the same, with no gulf between them? What the actual fuck is fucking wrong with so fucking many people, including yourself?
Are you all children? Do you assume im a child? If you assume im a child, is this some sort of default or do i raise some sort of flag?
If you are not a child or assuming im a child then how on earth do you expect depth or nuance when every statement must conform to your immediate visceral emotional response and assume is=aught?
You asked “Must they” as if there was a situation whete they shouldn’t be punished to the full extent of the law (at the very least that’s my interpretation of your question) and then called the uk a terf country that doesn’t have any laws.
Hence my joke about the big book of rules
Must not should. Jesus’s syphilitic cock i hate what weve made of our species.
Nobody said “should”?
Genuinely don’t get where the distinction is, like “they must get punished” and “they should get punished” say the same thing
Unless you’re thinking along the lines of “they will” vs “they should”, in which case I get where you’re coming from