☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 month agoBritish aircraft carrier will not be sent to Middle East, say officialswww.ft.comexternal-linkmessage-square9linkfedilinkarrow-up150arrow-down11file-textcross-posted to: world@quokk.au
arrow-up149arrow-down1external-linkBritish aircraft carrier will not be sent to Middle East, say officialswww.ft.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square9linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: world@quokk.au
minus-squarelorty@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 month agoIsn’t their only carrier unable to actually engage in any operations due to lack of escorts and/or crew?
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 month agoprobably cause it’s not actually sea worthy either
minus-squareFlyberius [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoI mean, it was built by the French, so probably
minus-squareHorse {they/them}@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agothey have two, one is in dry dock, the other one is the ship the article is about
minus-squarelorty@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoI was referring to the Prince of Wales. It suffered from a lot of technical problems and lack of escorts, but apparently they turned it around. Supposedly.
Isn’t their only carrier unable to actually engage in any operations due to lack of escorts and/or crew?
probably cause it’s not actually sea worthy either
I mean, it was built by the French, so probably
they have two, one is in dry dock, the other one is the ship the article is about
I was referring to the Prince of Wales. It suffered from a lot of technical problems and lack of escorts, but apparently they turned it around. Supposedly.