Snip:

Deepfake nudes and “revenge porn” must be removed from the internet within 48 hours or technology firms risk being blocked in the UK, Keir Starmer has said, calling it a “national emergency” that the government must confront.

Companies could be fined millions or even blocked altogether if they allow the images to spread or be reposted after victims give notice.

Amendments will be made to the crime and policing bill to also regulate AI chatbots such as X’s Grok, which generated nonconsensual images of women in bikinis or in compromising positions until the government threatened action against Elon Musk’s company.

Critical support to Starmer on this one thing I guess…

  • Johnny_Arson [she/her]@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Also fucking wild some German Lemmitor posted this as an example of “decline into censorship”. I reported that post and pinged the admin but it’s still up, figured it was worth sharing in a comm without the implicit defense of revenge porn and deepfake nudes.

    That isn’t censorship @schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de. Removing revenge porn and deepfake nudes and holding companies that refuse to police such things on their platforms accountable is the correct thing to do you sick fuck.

    edit:

    We were leaving it for the mod to action, but since they aren’t online I’ll remove it. Not sure why you are pinging db0, it’s hardly an emergency.

    -Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.com

    Creeps doing apologia for sexual harassment on their platform “hardly an emergency” actually yes it is and should result in an instant ban for the offender.

      • Johnny_Arson [she/her]@hexbear.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 months ago

        Also assuming Unruffled is banned because I cannot ping them and looking at their history jesus fucking christ good thing we did.

        Weird how a lot of their users seem fairly cool but all their admins are massive pieces of shit.

          • Johnny_Arson [she/her]@hexbear.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Ah so this is 100% on brand for them. I think this might be the time to ask their users why the hell they are still on that instance. They seem to have a lot of cool users but every position from their administration I have seen has been abhorrent.

    • Damarcusart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Funny how the “Everyone should be free from any sort of control and be allowed to do anything they want” people and the “I should be allowed nonstop instant gratification and be allowed to make porn of anything, even people I know IRL regardless of how it affects them” people are always the exact same guy.

    • pinguinu [any]@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      So fucking sad that people like that say “censorship bad” but look completely past literally all the vile shit done to anti-genocide people all over Europe (like what happened to Hüseyin Dogru, which is of course just the tip of the iceberg)

    • SootySootySoot [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Revenge porn sucks, freeze peach can’t be absoloute, and I don’t know what the original post said. But it is, definitionally, ‘censorship’ to block it.

      • Runcible [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        considering everything “speech” is an absurd position IMO. Possibly true in a philosophical or abstract fashion but absolutely not helpful in creating meaningful laws or healthy society

          • Johnny_Arson [she/her]@hexbear.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            I think considering sharing fabricated porn of a real person or sharing nudes of someone without their consent is severely torturing the concept of speech and free speech and getting into the weeds about it is unproductive and problematic in its own right.

      • Le_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        and it sucks that revenge porn works instead of everybody turning on the abuser posting or now creating it.

        perhaps a society that would not pile on a victim would also not produce that victimization in the first place

  • ChaosMaterialist [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    :heartbreaking:

    The recent incident of an open source maintainer getting libeled by a bot paints a picture of the future. We can expect autonomous agents to make revenge porn for coercive purposes without any human in the loop besides the victim. We will see more of these laws.

    • Johnny_Arson [she/her]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think so lmao. In the midst of all his reactionary social media crackdown shit he appears to have tripped over his own dick into one correct position.