Here’s an overview of community efforts to make The Files more accessible. I’ve written a small description and possible warnings alongside them.
Epstein Research GitHub Mirror
- A mirror for all the files
- ⚠️ Microsoft owns Github
- https://github.com/rhowardstone/Epstein-research
Epstein Files Research Database
- Search the complete DOJ production: ~1.4 million documents, ~2.8 million pages across 12 datasets — including transcribed audio & video, spreadsheets, and photographs, fully indexed
- https://epstein-data.com/
DOJ Tracker
- Project that tracks and documents every time the DOJ changes the files. Automated posts on Twitter when files change here.
- https://justice.geeken.dev/
- Google sheet: here
Jmail
- Access Jeffrey Epstein’s emails through a gmail interface and star important ones.
- https://jmail.world/
Jmail wiki
- Access the files through a WikiPedia-like interface.
- https://jmail.world/wiki/
Epstein Gate
- Using AI to rank, sort and map the files and create timelines from documents scattered across datasets.
- https://epsteingate.org/
- Source code: https://github.com/latent-variable/epstein-ranker
Epstein Exposed
- The most comprehensive searchable database of every person, document, flight, and connection in the Epstein files.
- https://epsteinexposed.com/
Track The Files
- A sourced, transparent investigation into the public figures named in the Epstein files — and the tax dollars that flow to them.
- ⚠️ Made with LLMs
- https://trackthefiles.org/
Epstein Document Network Explorer
- This is a network analysis tool for exploring relationships between people, places, and events captured in the Epstein emails released by the House Oversight Committee.
- https://epstein-doc-explorer-1.onrender.com/
EpsteIn
- See which of your LinkedIn connections appear in the Epstein files.
- https://github.com/cfinke/EpsteIn
3D Network Cloud
- Another visualisation tool
- https://epstein.dugganusa.com/
Epstein Archive
- ⚠️ Made with LLMs, seems stale*
- https://epstein-docs.github.io/
Please add more sources as comments, or let us know if one of them has gone dark or appears to be dodgy.
Exactly. It’s also refreshingly free from sensationalist claims of this, that or the other. It straightforwardly states what’s documented, how these documents are connected, and how these documents connect people and actions.
It poses critical questions and criticism of how investigations were done, and not done, how leads were not followed, and how redactions have been made that there seemingly are no legal grounds for.