@OP please add a source to you post - thanks
give them bread and circuses and they will never revolt
What does “Why we are not Sao Paulo” reference?
Ok, they are talking about economic growth, not cultural issues. Brazil’s 2011 New Macroeconomic Matrix policy lead to a bad recession in the 2010s.
Why does he have this disclaimer in his mail? He’s like the people that post in Facebook that they don’t consent Facebook using their data.
They’re emailing from their work account. The footer is almost certainly standard across the company
Those stupid ghetto people. Fortunately nobody has been bought off by Taylor Swift.
I mean, he’s right…
Jay-Z and Beyonce are both terrible fucking people who only ever cared about personal wealth and power.
But I’d rather give the credit to MLK for predicting this shit 60 years ago, or even Aaron McGruder for saying it in easily digested cartoon format.
We’d be a lot better off if part of highschool curriculum was making kids watch The Boondocks.
Man The Boondocks was great…
Granddad, you can’t tame the white supremacist power structure with cheese!!
Don’t even dreeeam of telling white people the truth
Did you just offer me cheese?!
Why, I’d love some cheese
Although, have you seen what some white folks will do for “fancy” cheese? (I say as a white folk who will do things for fancy cheese).
Maybe that’s the real key to the proletariat uprising. Threaten their cheese supply
Snowdonia is dirt cheap.
Wyt ti’n siarad Cymraeg? Rarebit Cymreig oedd fy nghinio.
God I wish I could visit snowdonia. Cambrian Way is a dream hike.
Sorry, don’t speak Welsh.
Ment this, but Wales is indeed beautiful
I’ve never heard anybody say anything not-positive about Beyonce before. I also don’t think anyone I really know is a fan, so I have only ever heard what one might encounter incidentally.
Is it possible to link to source instead of make us read painfully blurry shit?
Images of pure text violate web accessibility: post needs to link to source.
Images of text break much that text alternatives do not. Losses due to image of text lacking alternative such as link:
- usability
- we can’t quote the text without pointless bullshit like retyping it or OCR
- text search is unavailable
- the system can’t
- reflow text to varied screen sizes
- vary presentation (size, contrast)
- vary modality (audio, braille)
- accessibility
- lacks semantic structure (tags for titles, heading levels, sections, paragraphs, lists, emphasis, code, links, accessibility features, etc)
- some users can’t read the image due to lack of alt text (markdown image description)
- users can’t adapt the text for dyslexia or vision impairments
- systems can’t read the text to them or send it to braille devices
- web connectivity
- we have to do failure-prone bullshit to find the original source
- we can’t explore wider context of the original message
- authenticity: we don’t know the image hasn’t been tampered
- searchability: the “text” isn’t indexable by search engine in a meaningful way
- fault tolerance: no text fallback if
- image breaks
- image host is geoblocked due to insane regulations.
Contrary to age & humble appearance, text is an advanced technology that provides all these capabilities absent from images.
Fucking thank you. I can’t read this shit.
- usability
Yep! I counted on this failure of humankind. No problem, we just need to get away from dependence on goods, you can’t save everyone.
It blows my mind that many many many of these emails we’re seeing are sent and received from people’s work accounts.
It surprises you that they’re complete fuckwads w/ nepo money? Motherfucker can’t even properly abbreviate “advertisements”. 🤌🏼
Devil’s advocate. This guy could be on the side of the impoverished communities.
Give it a shot. How, exactly?
“The group that should be in the streets has been bought off.”
He is at least aware of the inequality and would have empathy with protesters.
Of course, it doesn’t necessarily follow that he would want “hip black people in hip cars” to protest so I’m not saying he is innocent, just that this email doesn’t necessarily imply evil thinking.
That statement reads less of a suggestion of what’s right and more of an awareness of what they’re doing is wrong. 🤢
In this case it’s awareness of how damaging Jay Z and Beyonce’s influence is, rather than their own.
But I will concede the argument to you. I’m more than happy to assume that everyone in the Epstein files is guilty, and they should prove their innocence.
All those people will have very interesting Wikipedia pages, like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jes_Staley#Relationship_with_Jeffrey_Epstein
Seems like he hadn’t noticed that he had been bought, too.
Was that section removed?
Wikipedia sucks.
Astroturfed garbageIt really depends on the subject
Anything remotely political related
It’s also that there are so many liberal Americans and self identified Democrats who secretly hate the poor as much as the elties do. There are a lot of folks who want to “help” the homeless just so they don’t have to look at them anymore. They don’t realize that to someone like Staley, they’re also despicable, worthless poor people.
They fear winding up like the homeless people they pity, and commiting the social sin of not being economically productive. So they’re unlikely to to risk giving up the trappings of a “middle-class” life even to stop the rise of fascism, at least until they themselves are threatened with being poor.
Basically, Staley’s assertation is correct, if a little shallow.
hate the poor as much as the elties do
Do people hate the car they drive? Why should the elite hate the poor? They use them. It’s the middle class who hates the poor in parts because they have to interact with them.
Difference being, when it comes time to maintain their car they’re likely to see it as an investment or worthwhile since that big fancy car has at least some value to them.
But when the poor need health care to keep working, the elites would prefer to simply discard them.
They simply let them die. That’s ignorance, not hate.
Indifference.
They’re aware of what the world they built does to people, but that’s just what they think the natural order of things should be.
I mean yea… I do want to help the homeless so I don’t have to look at them anymore. Who wants to watch people suffering under a broken system? That seems like a very reasonable motivator for trying to help them and fix the system.
Difference being that you’re actually concerned with their suffering and how broken things are, while others don’t really mind if Republicans put people in jail just for being homeless. They might cluck their tongues about it, but they aren’t going to put up any real opposition because it “keeps crime down”.
Most people don’t want to look at them because it’s depressing. Why do they find it depressing?
There are people who find looking at homeless people depressing because they empathize with someone who is suffering, and to be clear, nothing about my first comment implies that prejudice against the poor is a universal attitude among US liberals and Democrats.
But there are also people who don’t want to look at homeless people because having them around brings down their property values, or it makes them feel threatened, or judged, or because they believe everyone who’s homeless brought the situation on themselves. A decent number of these people are what the US calls liberals, they verbally support racial equality, equal rights for LGBTQIA persons, and probably pay lip service to public education and the idea of economic mobility. But, when you suggest something like building more public housing they whine about crime rates, complain about how people who live in the projects will just languish there and not improve themselves, and wring their hands over the safety of their children.
Hell, some will donate to build portable sheds to keep people from freezing to death, but will fight against building proper homes for them. That only makes sense if part of you believes that the homeless no longer deserve basic human dignity.
Look at the media representation homeless people have, crazy old men, exploited runaway teenage girls, and drug addicts. All people who “brought it on themselves” and all people to be pitied. You almost never see anything else. No one who simply got priced out of the housing market. No one who got evicted due to medical bills. No one living in a car while they work at McDonalds. No one moving from cheap motel to cheap motel while getting the kids to school. Few are in a situation that can’t be blamed on their own actions. No one who isn’t a danger or a cautionary tale. No families. No young children.
The US’s ideal of rugged individualism has absolutely pickled some people’s minds with the fundamental attribution bias to the extent that they don’t seem to believe the poor really belong among “productive members of society”. They didn’t keep up with the Joneses, as the good kind of people should, and somehow it must be their fault. They should be… elsewhere, and they don’t much care as long as they’re out of sight and out of mind. Prison might seem harsh, but at least they’re off the street and getting hot meals… They’d never suggest something so cruel, but they won’t turn out to protest or vote against it…
So, until these people feel directly threatened, they’re going to cling to the “consumer goods” the OP’s image is talking about, to the things that make them “belong” in our society, a big TV, an SUV instead of an economy car, a mortgage they can’t really afford, and the job that pays for them. They want those things more than social justice, not for the sake of the things, but because of what they represent in a consumerist society. They won’t go out and protest and they certainly wouldn’t risk participating in a general strike, at least not until there seems to be enough of a change in public opinion that they can do it safely. They’ll let the fascists win as long as they can keep counting themselves among the non-poor, to avoid being pushed out to go elsewhere by their former neighbors.
Their complacency is driven by classism. They’re just too dumb to realize that someone like Staley thinks they’re also worthless as anything other than another demographic to exploit.
the only sjw are the ones going out to protests, or active in the communites. almost every other D voters are center right, and do not like to be associated with poors or even some whites do not like INTERACTING with pocs and even lgbtq+ people, and display very CONSERVATIVE beliefs if not for being in a blue county, they would all be like schumer/jefferies.
thats why their isnt a cohesive movement, the right are all enamored by trump and they actually dont protest in general, because they are eaisly distracted by things they are told to hate, and not actually form a opinion on.
deleted by creator






