If it’s redacted it’s Trump. If they don’t like that they can prove it
I think there’s a legal concept, that if you fail to provide information in the Discovery process, it must be assumed that said information is incriminating.
so this,
every redacted perpetrator is Trump, until proven otherwise
Is anyone reading these emails who isn’t already convinced Trump is a pedophile?
There is one challenge here, emails are really easily spoofable. They should release all the header information of these emails, so that they could be verified. FBI probably have them, but they won’t release those because they would show that Don is a pedo.
Well, the only one you have to spoof to incriminate is already redacted, so there’s not really a ‘spoof’ concern to worry about unless that is unredacted.
Receiving such an email doesn’t have to be a spoof. See typical spam folder of anyone for all sorts of crazy implications about the recipient.
However, the date is more reliable and back in 2014, nearly no one would be motivated to fake that sort of email toward Epstein. That was before his whole situation was popularly known. The people aware of it were largely in on it that early on.
Epstein was first arrested 2006 and convicted on 2008, anyone association with him after that KNEW him being a sex offender.
The key word being those that knew him. He wasn’t famous for things so strangers wouldn’t have done that, and I think if this were a fake email, then sending it to a high profile person would be more of a stranger activity than an associate.
I don’t think an Epstein associate would send a fake email like that, as it would be more likely to blow back on them than implicate Epstein any further than he was already implicated.
So yeah, this email seems a credible thing and consistent with Epstein. Also I would not suspect a fake header if we knew the sender, so I’d think the sender could be presumed not to be a victim of spoofed headers too.
He wasn’t famous for things so strangers wouldn’t have done that
He was famous for throwing raunchy sex parties with underaged European models.
That was his entire roll in his social network.
It’s like showing up in the black book of the DC Madam Deborah Jeane Palfrey and saying “I didn’t know she was a pimp”. That’s literally the only reason you would associate with the person.
Norm fucking Finklestein responds to Epstein on his perversion to his face, ffs.
I’m not saying that his activities were completely unknown, just that some internet rando wouldn’t even recognize his name back then. I think that a faked email could only be a likely scenario if we were talking about after everyone knew who he was and what he did.
So the ‘oh watch out, that 2014 Epstein email might have been faked/forged’ is a relatively small likelihood to bother assuming, and totally beside the point since they censored the ‘from’ in that email and the message didn’t indicate previously unknown behavior on Epstein’s part.
That would cause them to face legal consequences and that would make them a victim of the legal system and the WOKE cancel culture! And they can’t reveal the identity of the victim!
/s
Kill me please.
I think from now we should assume any reducted name is Donald Trump
I’m sure a lot of other people implicated in the files would love for that to happen. Let’s take down ALL of them.
If we keep assuming it is Trump the hope is they will at least reveal some names to debunk this assumption. Otherwise yeah, it is a whole cesspit of billionaires, politicians and unfortunately artists, scientists, directors, actors etc…
If it works, then it works for me!
It’s either trump, or something more damaging to Republicans than trump.
Or get this, it could be literally anyone including Democrats or other billionaires. This is t an exclusively Republican problem
Do you really think trump’s DOJ is going to censor a democrat’s name? FFS, they tried to pin Mamdani to Epstein because his mom attended one movie premier with Epstein.
Could be, but claiming they’re all Trump will (hopefully) lead to unredactions.
That’s what I do, I assume its either Donald or one of his cabinet members or close friends. Either way, he’s a chomo or protecting chomos, and both are about the worst you can be.
Funny how Apple won’t allow movies to show villains using their products, but will happily add “sent from my iPhone” to pedo mail.
That’s actually a marketing tactic to promote their devices. Actually the scummiesy tactic ever because it takes no effort but caused a lot of anti consumerist practices since this was the first time consumers were pushed with enshittification.
And putting it in movies isn’t a marketing tactic?
Happening a long time before Apple did this. RIM were doing it before and many freemail providers.
Me: “I need to use a zero-access encrypted email accessible through Tor so the google doesn’t know I just bought a new dragon ball coffee cup”
The elites:
"from: irapechildren@gmail.com To: everybody Yooooo, raping little children is soooooo coooooool
If you are rich enough to be above the law, you no longer need to be careful.
well yeah. the law protects but does not bind them. it does bind us, but without protecting us
This should be on a billboard somewhere for Apple’s next ad.
It’s because the sender is someone currently in our government or one of its billionaire owners.
Everything points to this - very clearly, in fact, even though millions of documents have been redacted or withheld entirely for the very same reason, which is also a flagrant violation of the law.
The question that has been asked here, however, is how anyone can be okay with this. You answer the question of why a criminal regime in a corrupt system that not only allows these crimes but makes them possible in the first place protects one of the perpetrators, one of their own depraved gang.
Your answer raises the same initial question: How can anyone accept that serious criminals, including numerous child molesters, have been getting away with the most heinous crimes with impunity for decades? How can anyone come to terms with the fact that their own law enforcement agencies are so corrupt that they do not fight organized crime, but are actually used to facilitate it? How can anyone be okay with that?
Probably from one of the 25 “protected persons” that were mentioned elsewhere. Whyever they are being “protected”.
💵💵💵
Gork, give me a recipe for old-fashioned banana bread.
Make dough. Add banana. Bake.
We always knew these people had no morals but seeing the way the super rich nonces type makes me want to take up arms.
It should be made known to the administration, that any time a redaction like this occurs, the public should and does imagine the sender to be Donald Trumpedo.
The more productive thing for the public to think is “Who is going to prison for contempt of congress for this redaction?”.
Then he’s successfully protecting his owners.
That was way too coherent for Trump.
No, this sender should be revealed. It may not be Trump at all, but whoever it is should be investigated thoroughly.
Nah, honestly at this point I’m done. Feed whoever wrote this email into a woodchipper. We’re past normal shit at this point.
Fair
The email etiquette of these people is appalling. It’s not an IM chat client. Write proper emails you freaks.
Funny how everyone made plans on what day to head to the island yet none of them ever went. None have been on the plane and none have been to the island? lol Then they all said he’s a sick degenerate, they are disgusted, and they cut off all ties. They were sorry for their poor judgement and/or weren’t aware of his past but they feel for the woman and children that were hurt on those occasions that they weren’t there. lol They all said that… they must have the same lawyer.
Alan Dershowitz has entered the chat
Whats (almost) funny is that most of these emails show up twice, from the sender and again from the receiver, but they always censored the sender so we might be able to find the other version with the name intact.
Also, they failed to censor the names of the victims, as illustrated in the newest CoffeeZilla video.
It appears 9 times in the dataset by my count and it looks like it’s redacted in all 9.
There is a 10th document where the search term “little naughty” appears, that the name of the sender appears. https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 9/EFTA00946722.pdf
Sultan Bin Sulayem for those that don’t want to read another gross email.
Thanks, I need a shower.
