It was a genuine question believe it or not. And “yes” would have been sufficient.

  • redrum@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    My fault, I should have specified it has conservative and populist bias, and thanks for the other links. I don’t think that his editorial policy 90 years ago must be seen as the current policy but, as you has shown, it seems to be far-right and fascist “friendly”. I will edit my post to correct it.

    I'm going a lot off-topic here:

    I don’t think that even it has a fascists bias, we should prima faze reject its content. We should be specially critical: It’s a (wo)man-made story? What questions have been done? What narrative it’s try to push? …

    The only thing that I think that we could agree is that in the article the fascist question is in various points of the article, but it not seems to be the more important points that the journalist wants to communicate (it’s not in the firsts paragraphs), but the tittle gives it a special importance.

    I’m not sure what is the position of each of the Europeans fascisms about the Ukraine war, then I cannot Annalise it in this case. As a curiosity: During one or two years I was infiltrated in a telegram group of a fascist Spanish organization, that organization broke up two years ago. The most important flamewars there that I read there, just before the broke up, were “Duginist”[1] fascist vs. “Atlanticist”[2] fascist related to the Russian-Ukrainian war.

    Just to clarify: I was infiltrated for my antifascist militance. ACAB.


    1. For Aleksandr Dugin fascist ideology. ↩︎

    2. For pro State-Unitarians and pro NATO fascists. ↩︎