The worst-case scenario is now a possible one: European troops fighting off an invasion largely alone.

It’s by no means clear the Europeans would succeed. Romanian and other European officials at the exercise in Cincu, about 260 kilometers (162 miles) north of Bucharest by road, voiced concerns about how long it would take for NATO allies to make it to the front.

French four-star General Philippe de Montenon said he’s confident Europe could prevail, even without the US on side. “The direction of history is a progressive disengagement of the United States from the European continent,” he said.

archive

  • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Thankfully Russia can’t afford to stretch themselves much more. I implore them to try something it shouldn’t take much to fuck them at this point.

        • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          8 hours ago

          How about engaging in deescalation by not pushing for military escalation against our neighbor? How about entering commercial relations with neighboring countries instead of antagonizing them?

          • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Already tried that. We hoped that by buying massive amounts of Russian oil and gas they would see that peace is worth a lot more than war.

            But they decided war anyways. And suddenly we had to find a replacement for all that energy.

            • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Already tried that. We hoped that by buying massive amounts of Russian oil and gas they would see that peace is worth a lot more than war

              And Russia responded to that positively. In the late 2000s and early 2010s, there were even negotiations to make Russia enter the European Union. Those hopes for Russia were shattered when Europe and the US kept interfering in its sphere of influence (Georgia, Ukraine, etc) through colour revolutions and propaganda. The culminating point where Russia saw there was no possibility was when in 2014, the democratically elected president of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovich was removed by a US-sponsored colour revolution (see Victoria Nuland’s leaked phonecalls), that’s actually what triggered the invasion of Crimea. It was Russia’s way of saying “I cannot win the soft-power competition against the US, so if my only way to maintain a sphere of influence is through military power, so be it”.

              If you still don’t believe allowing for a Russian “sphere of influence” is an important geopolitical item if we want worldwide peace, imagine how USA people and their government would react to Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, Cuba, Costa Rica, Venezuela, Colombia and Peru entering a military alliance with Russia and China and started to import military material from said countries and have Chinese and/or Russian military bases. Last time something similar happened with Cuba, the world was on the brink of nuclear war.

              • 87Six@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                My brother in foreign affairs, Russia has been an aggressor of Ukraine it’s whole existence.

                Ukraine signed an agreement which cited that it would give up nuclear warheads for protection by the USA against Russia.

                That protection never happened. Crimea was taken. Chaos ensued on the borders. The Russia struck their fucking capital.

                AND YOU WANT US TO FUCKING TRADE WITH RUSSIA, lol… Surely that will fix everything.

          • msage@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Yeah, how about no escalation? No hybrid war tactics? No drones in foreign airspace? No threats to neighbouring countries?

            • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Cool, I agree that all of those things should stop. How about we engage in actual negotiations with Russia instead of grinding down Ukrainian young men in trenches as a form of diplomacy?

              • wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Because appeaemt doesn’t work?

                They’re not willing to engage in good faith. If they were they never would have started the “special operations” in the first place. Nor would they be asking to keep all of their gains in the war.

                • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  They were more than willing to engage in good faith from late 1990s to early 2010s, it’s the constant western meddling in Georgia, Ukraine, Moldova and other Russian sphere of influence countries, coupled with the expansion of NATO, that pushed Russia to isolation. Russia doesn’t have the economic or soft power to fight the US+EU in that field, so either US+EU accept Russia peacefully having its own sphere of influence, or Russia will naturally attempt to do so militarily.

                  The USA doesn’t need to militarily engage in Mexico because it already belongs to its sphere of influence, in Venezuela they don’t enjoy that so the natural response is to threaten with military invasion (as it’s doing now). It’s basic geopolitics.

                  • Mechaguana@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 hours ago

                    What about the stolen ukrainian children, was that a de-escalation tactic as well? Face it, theses russians are some of the worst neighbors europe could have, and I’m not even gonna mention the cyber warfare, the arsons, the shooting down of civilian airplanes, that journalist body returned with her fucking eyes scooped out.

                  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 hours ago

                    so either US+EU accept Russia peacefully having its own sphere of influence, or Russia will naturally attempt to do so militarily.

                    Aww poor Russia, they were just trying to “peacefully have its own sphere of influence”.

                    Give me a fucking break.

                    And what the US is doing in Venezuela is not a “natural response” to anything, and to try to point to it as a justification for Russia’s actions is actually insane.