Swiss voters on Sunday decisively rejected a call to require women to do national service in the military, civil protection teams or other forms, as all men must do already.

Official results. with counting still ongoing in some areas after a referendum, showed that more than half of Switzerland’s cantons, or states, had rejected the “citizen service initiative” by wide margins. That meant it was defeated, because proposals need a majority of both voters and cantons to pass.

Voters also heavily rejected a separate proposal to impose a new national tax on individual donations or inheritances of more than 50 million francs ($62 million), with the revenues to be used to fight the impact of climate change and help Switzerland meet its ambitions to have net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    Because it is theft. If my parents are successful and pay their taxes why is it fair to double tax a child’s inheritance. You tax earnings and income. You don’t the same money multiple times.

        • Guy Ingonito@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Over 60 Million dollars is a lot of money. More money than your kid needs to live comfortably and never have to work ever again. That’s so much money you are creating a family that never has to experience the life of a normal person and can use that money to influence politics to compound that effect.

          How much money does a person need to live comfortably without having to contribute labor? 2-5 million? Is living in luxury but not so much that someone who’s never had a real job can just buy elections unfair?

          • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            You are presenting issues that are irrelevant to the tax. Yes those things you mentioned are unfair and should be regulated accordingly. Those are irrelevant to an inheritance tax. If you want to create a wealth tax over a certain amount that’s fine but call a spade a spade. Don’t hide it as inheritance tax and allow wealthy people to hide their money in other ways like trusts and businesses.

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Thing is the same money does regularly get taxed multiple times. You get shafted on money as it comes to you (income tax) and u get shafted on that money once you spend it to (sales tax). Hell I bought a house and will get to pay taxes on that annually for as long as I own it, despite already paying my state and fed govt taxes.

      • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Just because everyone is getting fucked doesn’t mean it’s right. Double taxing only hurts the poor because they can’t hide money in tax free investments or businesses that they use to write off expenses.