https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/talks-could-have-ended-war-ukraine | Archived
At the first meeting, the Russians presented a set of harsh conditions, effectively demanding Ukraine’s capitulation. This was a nonstarter. But as Moscow’s position on the battlefield continued to deteriorate, its positions at the negotiating table became less demanding. So on March 3 and March 7, the parties held a second and third round of talks […]
Regarding territorial issues, parts of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions of Donbass would remain under Russian control
Moscow ostensibly wanted Kiev to slash the size of its army to 85,000 people, while Ukraine insisted on retaining a strength of 250,000.
Edit: Replaced “reporter” with “politician” in the post title
Edit2: Changed title from “microphone cut” to “segment cut short” in the title



I absolutely agree. So to tackle this issue from the immigration end first is really putting the cart before the horse.
That’s where we’re at, no? I fully appreciate that this is a symptom of imperialism, but what’s why it’s so much incredibly important that the left be taking it on as a fight against Imperialism, not joining the right in fighting immigration.
I completely agree again, you’ve made excellent points here and I think we agree on the theory, I don’t agree that the execution is following through.
Especially because the other important point that keeps getting missed is the BSW wants to increase police presence and funding. IF, the BSW was looking to pay indigenous people reparations to stay in the country to counter immigration, I would be all for it. But their plan sounds a lot more like a reflection of the US imperial core and ICE.
Oh yeah, neither do I. I’m talking in general, the BSW case just seems to be national chauvinism. And as you say, even if it wasn’t and the intent was good, it would be putting the cart before the horse.