• andz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m with you there, in theory at least. Chinese money tends to come with strings attached, though. I’d be weary of that kind of influence without proper oversight.

    It’s not like the WHO hasn’t flip-flopped on things before due to outside pressure either, so there’s some precedent there.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yes. There’s no oversight, whoever puts the money has the influence. US, China, EU, Canada, Australia, etc. We need to move away from the idea of funding being separable from influence. About anything. The economic dimension isn’t separate from the political one. It’s a myth we are told that’s served to further the interests of capital against the rest of us. If any country or block wants the influence we/they can put up the money.

      • andz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        We’re in agreement then. I mean, I don’t have anything in particular against China as such, I just don’t like how they handled COVID and I certainly have some issues with their governance at large, but their money would still be welcome if there was proper oversight.

        I do hope WHO will get up and running at 100% though, they’re sorely needed. Considering what’s happening in the US I don’t think it’ll be long before some shit happens over there as well.