cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/37367499

This is building consent for a US war on Venezuela.

Nobel war prize more like, considering the people they award this to.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Material evidence of them giving a Noble Peace Prize to someone who ended up being a war criminal? Sounds pretty subjective to me.

    But I will bite. Obama. Now it is up to you to refute he is not a war criminal and it was not a shitty pick. GO!

    • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      No, material proof of the USA forcing the Nobel committee to appoint someone as that is your actual claim. You don’t have that so you are offering up a strawman

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        I never made that claim, you did. I can’t prove a claim you made up. Please go back and try reading.

        • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          " Doomsider @lemmy.world English Are you seriously suggesting that Noble Peace awards are beyond influence and corruption"

          Literally your claim. Do you have proof of this?

          • Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            And I gave an example of a corrupt pick. Obama.

            So I never said the US forced them to pick anyone only that they are not above influence.

            Are you done making up strawmen now?

            The amount of dishonesty you display is staggering.

            • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              No you offered up a strawman with Obama as he was not picked by the USA nor have you provided evidence that Obama’s selection was influenced by the USA. You argued against his selection to “win” which is what a strawman argument is.

              You offered no proof of influence or corruption only a straw-man claim.

              • Doomsider@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 days ago

                Lol, I am done playing logical fallacies with you. You just keep saying things I never said acting like a buffoon. Have fun arguing with yourself. Cheers!