• Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comMEnglish
    0·
    2 months ago

    Yes and I’ve asked the admin to explain the rationale. I’m pretty sure everyone on our admin team is anti-zionist, but any one of us would likely remove a comment that looks like straight up antisemitism. We aren’t a freeze peach instance. If you meant something different then feel free to explain, perhaps we have all misinterpreted what you were trying to say?

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.orgOP
      01·
      2 months ago

      My comment was responding to the original comment:

      Weekly reminder that Jordan Lund is the same piece of shit Zionist redditor that hates BLM because protests are too loud and inconvenience him. The dude is a republican shitstain.

      To which I replied indicating that American jews have been know to treat blacks poorly. A claim that about as easy to support with historical record as white christian racism against the blacks in the US.

      I am not really sure how calling historical behavior by a group of people is antisemitism but server admin is server admin.

      As I pointed out in another chain… it does not pass the switch the race test.

      For example, today I called out British oppression of the Irish. Theoretically i generalized all british being savages but that comment did not generate any controversy or a censorship.