I doubt that. It’s pretty big, and he’s in very bad shape.

You know the article author probably isn’t on here, yeah?

The headline is misleading. The article is even worse

Those two sentences together cannot possibly be referring to the actions.

The…wrongness…The article is not even worse. The article says exactly what he claims it doesn’t. And regardless, the point is that she was ultimately killed because she tried to escape. The family’s justification is worthless, and irrelevant.

All of this is in the article. I don’t understand why you have 40 people agreeing with you.

That’s so funny I just mentioned Tucker Carlson, talking about people getting beaten to death in unimaginable ways.

And But where we can’t piece together the simplest sentences.

I don’t see approval ratings any different from normal. Where are they sinking?

A station in Iowa had gas for $1.85…but I was down to less than $2/gallon

… isn’t $1.85 under $2.00? I swear 1 came before 2 when I learned.

I don’t understand. Did we not already have that rule?

I don’t understand. Are these 2 things different? Are these not both just different adjectives for the same philosophy?

Why are you guessing? The headline says that already.

So maybe 5% difference from 6 years ago.

What are you talking about? The headline clearly says she’s winning the election.

Nice. So is there a lot of blood?

So I take then you know that was the only issue the bill addressed, with no riders, so you’re certain it should have passed. The MTG bill definitely didn’t fund any wacko conservative garbage, right?

If the DNC goes anywhere near MTG, they should be sued for… something bad.

Some moron on here yesterday said they trust Magic Taylor Green more.

My guess is because you’re not that smart.

I don’t know, how can what you just said be defended?