Looks like a bunch of headlines about the same story

A non-Google link: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/10/housing-bill-becomes-law-without-trump-veto

The review, … did not establish causal links between screen use and specific developmental conditions.

So…speculation about possible harms funded by a foundation set up by a Conservative

What’s wrong with men wearing makeup?

You’re right, instead Hoover got to wield the FBI as a cudgel against his political opponents and people who didn’t support him

Including on American citizens

1-2? Like choosing to destroy the wealth of millions of homeowners while bailing out the banks, and deporting millions of hardworking people?

Looks like the Gulf petrostates will fund it

New book on the topic: Unpaid: The Past, Present and Future of Wage Theft by Matthew Cole

Class conscious finally gains some traction with the broader public, and the socialist word police out here like “Stahp, you’re doing it wrong!!”

This doesn’t seem to be a NIV issue.

When people who are fighting injure a pregnant woman so that there is a miscarriage and yet no further harm follows, the one responsible shall be fined what the woman’s husband demands

—Exodus 21:22, NRSV

May this water that brings a curse enter your body so that your abdomen swells or your womb miscarries.

—Numbers 5:22, NRSV

What translation(s) are you referring to that seem to suggest something different?

Actually God only demands a monetary fine if you cause a miscarriage in someone who didn’t want one (Exodus 21), and requires that you drink a potion that will give you a miscarriage if you got pregnant by someone who isn’t your husband (Numbers 5). If only those Republicans could read their own Bible, they would be very upset.

The 1920s were the last decade in American history during which one could be genuinely optimistic about politics. Since 1920, the vast increase in welfare beneficiaries and the extension of the franchise to women — two constituencies that are notoriously tough for libertarians — have rendered the notion of “capitalist democracy” into an oxymoron.

• Peter Thiel, 2009

“…a gilded trash remake of Jonathan Glazer’s The Zone of Interest in which a button-eyed Cinderella points at gold baubles and designer dresses, cunningly distracting us while her husband and his cronies prepare to dismantle the Constitution and asset-strip the federal government."

Introducing E-Corp stablecoin!

What’s the difference? Nationality? Skin color?

Thanks for the clarification, sadly

If anybody is still under the impression that someone somewhere in the chain of command might refuse illegal orders, this tells you everything you need to know

That’s why it’s good they’re owned by an independent foundation and not shareholders looking to win merger approval to expand a media empire

Radical Reconstruction doesn’t sound so bad, eh?