The worst-case scenario is now a possible one: European troops fighting off an invasion largely alone.

It’s by no means clear the Europeans would succeed. Romanian and other European officials at the exercise in Cincu, about 260 kilometers (162 miles) north of Bucharest by road, voiced concerns about how long it would take for NATO allies to make it to the front.

French four-star General Philippe de Montenon said he’s confident Europe could prevail, even without the US on side. “The direction of history is a progressive disengagement of the United States from the European continent,” he said.

archive

  • CleoCommunist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Aremed confrontation as in military, especially if the people dont want to be there fighting, Isnt good.

    Unfortunately with some governments you cant treat in peace and the people Will Need to arm themselves and do stuff.

    I still Think that in any case there should be the leasts deaths possibile

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      No one is arguing otherwise.

      But your original question is why do we still need the military when we have smartphones, and of course the answer is because the existence of smartphones does not dissuade the likes of Putin, because why would it?

      • CleoCommunist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It was and example to show how we developedand how we progress but still do something as primitive as war