• manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Ratheon is only up %45 since this time last year, do you think theyll be okay? Do they need to find more people to kill?

  • limer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    I think this is another scheme to manipulate the stocks, some people will buy low and know when to sell, just before some staged drama by the administration to raise the prices suddenly

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 days ago

      you can be more certain of this if the negotiations fall apart again by another poison pill from trump.

  • dan1101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    They are no longer defense stocks, they are war stocks. Department of War.

  • DaMummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    Everyone has almost figured out what the Ukraine thing was all about all along.

      • DaMummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Looking at the stock prices of US weapon manufacturers right after the Ukraine war started will answer all questions.

          • DaMummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            There’s an old saying in Texas, I know it’s in Texas, probably in Tennessee, that says “fool me once, shame on…shame on you? You fool me, you can’t get fooled again!”

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            No, but it gives a good place to start. The west has absolutely hollowed out and looted Ukraine, and used it as a battering ram to damage Russia as much as they could. The US blew up Nordstream specifically to try to decouple western Europe from cheap Russian gas. The US Empire, post-2014 Euromaidan coup, uses Ukraine similarly to how they use Israel, to secure its interests in the region.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                17
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                Yes, which part are you skeptical of? I think these are pretty clear at this point, though. Most of this is from comrade @yogthos@lemmy.ml


                • Asetru@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  So, there were these points you mentioned:

                  • The west has absolutely hollowed out and looted Ukraine
                  • used it as a battering ram to damage Russia as much as they could.
                  • The US blew up Nordstream specifically to try to decouple western Europe from cheap Russian gas.
                  • The US Empire, post-2014 Euromaidan coup, uses Ukraine similarly to how they use Israel, to secure its interests in the region.

                  The first two links are about US officials discussing who they’d like to see active in a Ukrainian government and who they don’t. Doesn’t relate to any of your points. Maybe the last, but simply discussing which people are currently doing what in another country during a state of turmoil doesn’t really say anything.

                  The counterpunch link is just weird… It’s just a long list of weird accusations and propaganda without any substance at all. Looking at the site, it’s not a neutral news source anyway, but that, too, doesn’t give any sources concerning any of your points beyond “look, western politicians visited Ukraine”. Well, no shit.

                  The Consortium News article starts with brandishing the opposition as a Neo-Nazi movement and disqualifies itself utterly by that within the first few sentences. Like, those are your sources? That’s insane.

                  The Monthly Review Online article is about the Maidan massacre. Not directly related to the points above.

                  Maidan coup thread: deals with the question “Is there any credible evidence that Ukraine’s 2014 revolution was due to a CIA coup”. Even if the answer to this was “yes”, it wouldn’t be relevant to any of the points above.

                  Coup details: same. Like, it keeps going on how the US influenced actors. Well, no shit. That’s what politicians do. I still don’t see the connection to the allegations stated above and the way it’s framed in the article is despicable.

                  “Don’t get it wrong”: “The EU doesn’t care about Ukrainian lives — in 2014, they supported a far-right coup”, nah, I’m out. “Far right coup”, what bullshit. This whole myth of Nazis taking over Ukraine is just ridiculous and any article that keeps iterating that Russian propaganda is not believable.

                  advocating inflicting a military defeat on Russia in Ukraine… Helping Ukraine defend itself against an invading agressor because it serves your interest as well doesn’t make your second point true. Russia could stop the war today if they simply stopped attacking another country. They don’t. It’s not the west that uses Ukraine, it’s Ukraine that uses the west’s interest to reduce Russian power to defend itself. You’re mixing up cause and effect.

                  Washington, via CIA paramilitaries, has been fighting a proxy war - bullshit. The article is about US people training Ukrainian people, not about the CIA fighting a war. Helping Ukraine defend itself doesn’t mean you’re “using it”. If you’re teaching somebody some self defense to no longer get beaten up by a bully, you’re not fighting a proxy fistfight. What a stupid take.

                  NYT coup coverage with CIA involvement - same.

                  Nordstream US involvement evidence - long, long article that ends up accusing Ukrainian nationalists. No US involvement mentioned.

                  The US harvesting Ukraine for minerals - and here it is, the one part that I agree with you and that I think is believable. And of all the points up there, this only partly backs up the last one, because “getting resources” isn’t really “securing its interest in the region” (or one might argue it’s even the opposite, considering historic precedence such as Versailles, but I guess Trump doesn’t think that far ahead). Yeah, that sucks. But still, there is no indication of the US or any other western state being the cause here - it’s just Trump, the Russian asset of all the people, trying to take advantage of a situation.

  • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    6 days ago

    If this appeasement offer to russia actually comes to fruition, then serious armament initiatives in Europe will only gain steam.

    This so called peace agreement is nothing but an invitation for a much larger war.